Labor and Employment
Silence is Golden – NLRB Affirms Employer Restrictions on Employee Discussions with Media
October 11, 2019
Continuing its recent conservative approach, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) ruled Thursday that an employer’s policies restricting employees from answering media inquiries and discussing customer information with third parties were lawful. The decision in LA Specialty Produce Co. and Teamsters Local 70 joined similar Board decisions reached in the past two years by relying on the standard adopted by the Board in December of 2017 in Boeing Co. Under the Boeing Co. standard, written employer policies are evaluated based on the nature and extent of their potential impact on employee rights guaranteed by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) counterbalanced against an employer’s legitimate business justifications. Using these considerations, policies are grouped into one of three categories designed to help guide employers and future Board determinations.
In LA Specialty Produce Co., the challenged employer policies prohibited employees from answering media inquiries and from providing the employer’s client/vendor lists to third parties. A majority of the Board ruled that the policies furthered legitimate employer interests without interfering with protected rights. The majority reasoned that the client/vendor list rule did not prohibit employees from discussing concerns with union representatives, despite claims otherwise, and that restrictions on media inquiries did not interfere with employees’ rights to talk with media sources about workplace concerns because it only barred workers from speaking for the company when approached by the media. Employees are still free to take union and workplace concerns to the press under the policy.
While the decision helps clarify the rights of employers to protect their confidential customer and vendor information and to prevent opportunities for misstatements on behalf of the employer to the media, employers should be cognizant of the limitations on the ruling. The ruling does not permit employers to restrict all third-party communications or media contacts. Earlier decisions of the Board have ruled that many such restrictions are barred by the NLRA. Additionally, the decision in LA Specialty Produce Co. is split along partisan lines, with all three votes favoring the decision coming from Republican appointees. It also relies on a relatively new, and heavily-contested, legal standard that had overruled a prior long-standing rule set forth in Lutheran Heritage Village-Livonia. Consequently, employers should continue to adopt policies that are closely-tailored to legitimate overriding business concerns, and should remain attentive to the ever-evolving political winds and changes in Board composition when updating and reviewing employment policies.
If you have questions about this new rule, please contact Chris M. Mason, or any other attorney in our Labor and Employment practice.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Chris M. Mason | Read Bio
About Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C.
For over 75 years, Jennings Strouss has been dedicated to providing clients with strategic legal guidance to help them seize every opportunity. The firm is well-known for its rich heritage, commitment to community, and long-lasting relationships. We have a deep understanding of business and law. When you work with us, you’ll have a team of legal experts who are dedicated to your vision of success.
Through our offices in Phoenix, Austin, Peoria, and Tucson, Arizona, and Washington, D.C., we leverage resources both regionally and nationally to serve our expanding client base. Jennings Strouss is deeply rooted in each of our locations’ legal and business communities, and especially instrumental in helping shape the dynamic growth of Arizona and many of its institutions. The firm promotes a pragmatic, results-oriented approach, coupled with a healthy, well-managed, and friendly atmosphere of collaboration.
Our primary areas of practice include advertising and media law; agribusiness; automobile dealership law; bankruptcy, restructuring, and creditors’ rights; construction; corporate and securities; eminent domain and condemnation; employee benefits and pensions; energy; estate planning and probate; family law and domestic relations; finance; healthcare; insurance defense; intellectual property; labor and employment; legal ethics; litigation; medical malpractice; professional liability defense; real estate; surety and fidelity; and tax.
For additional information, please visit jsslaw.com and follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.
The Law Firm Alliance
One East Washington Street, Suite 1900
Phoenix, AZ 85004-2554
P 602.262.5911 | F 602.495.2979
111 Congress Ave, Suite 500
Austin, TX 78701-4076
P 512.932.6040 | F 512.932.6055
9051 West Kelton Lane, Suite 9
Peoria, AZ 85382-3533
P 623.878.2222 | F 623.878.1333
1760 E. River Road, Suite 230
Tucson, AZ 85718-5990
P 520.618.1050 | F 520.618.1070
1300 I Street NW, Suite 1120
Washington, D.C. 20005-3314
P 202.292.4738 | F 202.371.9025